Xem thêm

Can You Really Buy Land on the Moon?

Have you ever wondered if it's actually possible to buy property on the Moon? You may have heard that there are loopholes in the legal code that allow individuals to purchase their own piece of...

Have you ever wondered if it's actually possible to buy property on the Moon? You may have heard that there are loopholes in the legal code that allow individuals to purchase their own piece of lunar land. This idea has attracted the attention of many celebrities who hope to claim their share before private companies or nations do. But is this claim legitimate?

The truth is that international treaties state that no nation can own the Moon. These treaties also establish that the Moon belongs to all humans and cannot be owned by any state. So, does this mean private ownership is impossible? The short answer is yes.

The long answer, however, is more complicated. Several nations, including the ESA and NASA, have plans to build outposts and settlements on the Moon in the coming decades. Russia's Roscosmos and China's CNSA also have their own plans for lunar bases. The existence of these plans has brought attention to the legal framework surrounding the Moon and other celestial bodies.

Let's take a closer look at the history of "space law" and the relevant treaties. In 1967, the United States, United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union signed the Outer Space Treaty, which became the basis of international space law. This treaty states that outer space, including the Moon, cannot be appropriated by any nation through sovereignty, use, occupation, or any other means.

However, the treaty does not specifically address the rights of private individuals or bodies in owning property in outer space. This has led to debates about whether private appropriation is allowed under the treaty. Some argue that property rights should be recognized based on jurisdiction rather than territorial sovereignty.

While the Outer Space Treaty does not explicitly mention private ownership, it does hold governments responsible for the actions of any entity operating in space. This means that anyone operating in space, including private individuals, organizations, or companies, is answerable to their respective government. This oversight suggests that the spirit of the treaty applies to both public and private entities.

To close the supposed loopholes in the Outer Space Treaty, the Moon Treaty was presented in 1979. This treaty aimed to establish a legal framework for the use of the Moon and other celestial bodies. It banned weapons testing, required open sharing of scientific research, and prohibited any form of ownership. However, the Moon Treaty has not been ratified by any state engaged in space exploration, rendering it ineffective.

In practice, while there is no explicit prohibition on private companies owning land on the Moon, there is no legal mechanism to claim or sell lunar land. Any documentation claiming ownership of lunar land is unenforceable, and no nation that has signed the Outer Space Treaty or the Moon Treaty will recognize such claims.

Now, the idea of building settlements or even tourist industries on the Moon is becoming a serious consideration. With multiple space agencies and companies involved, we can expect legal battles in the future. However, the harsh conditions on the Moon, including extreme temperatures, low gravity, and abrasive lunar dust, make it an inhospitable place for long-term stays.

In conclusion, while the concept of buying land on the Moon may be intriguing, it remains a fantasy without legal standing. The Moon belongs to all of humanity, and no individual or company can claim ownership. So, for now, it's best to admire the Moon from afar and appreciate its beauty as a celestial neighbor.

Image source: The ESA recently elaborated its plan to create a Moon base by the 2030s. (Credit: ESA/Foster + Partners)