Xem thêm

Billionaire Harlan Crow: His Controversial Property Deal with Clarence Thomas Revealed

In a surprising turn of events, it has come to light that billionaire Harlan Crow, known for his conservative political influence, purchased properties from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his family. The deal, which...

The block in Savannah, Georgia, where Texas billionaire Harlan Crow bought property from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Today, the vacant lots Thomas sold to Crow have been replaced by two-story homes. Credit: Octavio Jones for ProPublica

In a surprising turn of events, it has come to light that billionaire Harlan Crow, known for his conservative political influence, purchased properties from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his family. The deal, which took place in 2014, raises questions about the lack of disclosure on Thomas' part and the potential conflicts of interest that may have arisen from this transaction.

A Quiet Acquisition

The properties in question were located on a serene residential street in Savannah, Georgia. Crow's company acquired an old single-story home and two vacant lots from Thomas and his relatives, making this the first known instance of monetary exchange between the Republican megadonor and the Supreme Court justice.

Thomas’ signature on the deed for his deal with Crow. A 2014 photograph shows the vacant lots that Crow bought from Thomas. Credit: Chatham County Superior Court and Chatham County Metropolitan Planning Commission.

An Unusual Position

What adds an extra layer of intrigue to this deal is the fact that Crow now owns the house where Thomas' elderly mother resides. After the sale was finalized, significant renovations were carried out on the property, including the addition of a carport, a repaired roof, and a new fence and gates. This raises questions about the motivations behind these improvements and their potential impact on the property's value.

A Violation of Disclosure Laws?

According to ethics law experts, Thomas violated federal disclosure laws by failing to report the details of this real estate transaction. The law requires officials to disclose real estate sales over $1,000, including the identity of the buyer in private transactions. Thomas left this space blank, raising suspicions about a possible financial relationship with Crow.

Crow's Response

In the face of mounting scrutiny, Crow offered a statement defending his actions. He claimed that his intention in purchasing Thomas' mother's house was to preserve it as a historic site and eventually turn it into a public museum dedicated to the legacy of the nation's second black Supreme Court Justice. However, he did not directly address why he also bought the vacant lots from Thomas.

Unanswered Questions

The precise nature of the financial arrangement between Thomas and Crow remains unclear. It is unknown if Crow paid fair market value for the properties or if any special considerations were involved. Crow's company, Savannah Historic Developments LLC, handled the purchase, but details regarding the pricing and valuation have not been provided.

Transforming the Neighborhood

Crow's purchases had a profound impact on the neighborhood, leading to the transformation of the block. Many of the properties he acquired were subsequently sold to new owners who built upscale modern homes. Crow's company even demolished a neighboring house known for noise and parties, replacing it with a new house made available to a local police officer.

Today, the block features a mix of long-time elderly homeowners and a growing population of young newcomers. The vacant lots that were previously owned by the Thomas family have been replaced by pristine two-story homes. The neighborhood has experienced a rejuvenation, with the presence of artisanal coffee shops, bistros, and a vibrant community.

Calls for Investigation

This revelation regarding the property deal between Harlan Crow and Clarence Thomas has sparked outcry among Democratic lawmakers, leading to calls for further investigation. The controversy surrounding Thomas' relationship with Crow, including the acceptance of luxury travel and gifts, has underlined concerns about ethics and potential conflicts of interest within the Supreme Court.

It remains to be seen how this controversy will unfold and whether further action will be taken to ensure transparency and accountability in the highest echelons of power.

[E-E-A-T]: Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness, Experience [YMYL]: Your Money or Your Life

1